Introduce support for the Qualcomm IPQ50xx SoC.
This series adds support for the following components:
- minimal boot support: GCC/pinctrl/watchdog/CPUFreq/SDI (upstreamed)
- USB2 (upstreamed)
- Thermal/Tsens
- PCIe gen2 1&2-lane PHY and controller
- PWM and PWM LED
- QPIC SPI NAND controller
- CMN PLL Block (provider of fixed rate clocks to GCC/ethernet/more.)
- Ethernet: IPQ5018 Internal GE PHY (1 gbps)
- Remoteproc MPD driver for IPQ5018 (2.4G) & QCN6122 (5/6G) Wifi
Co-developed-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@outlook.com>
Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/17182
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Currently the compile phase of the kernel builds `Image dtbs modules`.
However, none of the dtbs that get built are used for the final image.
This ends up unnecessarily taking CPU cycles and produces a lot of
`WARNINGS` that can lead users to believe there's cause for concern. I
believe the same principle can be applied to other targets.
```
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-mtp.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-sony-xperia-tone-dora.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-sony-xperia-tone-kagura.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-sony-xperia-tone-keyaki.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-gemini.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-natrium.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-scorpio.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
```
Signed-off-by: Sean Khan <datapronix@protonmail.com>
6.6 has been in testing on qualcommax for a while so it should be in a
good shape, but lets default to it to get a wider audience.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
This one will not compile again latest master using kernel 6.6,
and it's not in the vanilla openwrt anyway.
```
2024-03-24T20:12:38.7478671Z fal_port_ctrl.c:216:1: error: conflicting types for 'fal_port_cdt' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'sw_error_t(a_uint32_t, fal_port_t, a_uint32_t, a_uint32_t *, a_uint32_t *)' {aka 'sw_error_t(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int *, unsigned int *)'} [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
2024-03-24T20:12:38.7481656Z 216 | fal_port_cdt(a_uint32_t dev_id, fal_port_t port_id, a_uint32_t mdi_pair,
2024-03-24T20:12:38.7482137Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
2024-03-24T20:12:38.7482430Z In file included from fal_port_ctrl.c:21:
2024-03-24T20:12:38.7484444Z /workdir/openwrt/build_dir/target-aarch64_cortex-a53_musl/linux-qualcommax_ipq807x/qca-ssdk-shell-2022.09.12~b43fba2d/include/fal/fal_port_ctrl.h:599:5: note: previous declaration of 'fal_port_cdt' with type 'sw_error_t(a_uint32_t, fal_port_t, a_uint32_t, fal_cable_status_t *, a_uint32_t *)' {aka 'sw_error_t(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, fal_cable_status_t *, unsigned int *)'}
2024-03-24T20:12:38.7486319Z 599 | fal_port_cdt(a_uint32_t dev_id, fal_port_t port_id, a_uint32_t mdi_pair,
2024-03-24T20:12:38.7486786Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
2024-03-24T20:12:38.8694755Z cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
2024-03-24T20:12:38.8732680Z make[5]: *** [/workdir/openwrt/build_dir/target-aarch64_cortex-a53_musl/linux-qualcommax_ipq807x/qca-ssdk-shell-2022.09.12~b43fba2d/make/target.mk:13: fal_port_ctrl.o] Error 1
2024-03-24T20:12:38.8734847Z make[5]: Leaving directory '/workdir/openwrt/build_dir/target-aarch64_cortex-a53_musl/linux-qualcommax_ipq807x/qca-ssdk-shell-2022.09.12~b43fba2d/src/fal_uk'
2024-03-24T20:12:38.8736336Z make[4]: *** [Makefile:28: uslib_o] Error 1
2024-03-24T20:12:38.8737682Z make[4]: Leaving directory '/workdir/openwrt/build_dir/target-aarch64_cortex-a53_musl/linux-qualcommax_ipq807x/qca-ssdk-shell-2022.09.12~b43fba2d'
2024-03-24T20:12:38.8739495Z make[3]: *** [Makefile:51: /workdir/openwrt/build_dir/target-aarch64_cortex-a53_musl/linux-qualcommax_ipq807x/qca-ssdk-shell-2022.09.12~b43fba2d/.built] Error 2
```
Therefore, propose to drop/remove this package, and anyone who really
need this can use community builds (that has out-of-tree NSS packages,
like ECM and WiFi offloading).
Introduce support for the Qualcomm IPQ60xx SoC. WiFi support still has
to be handled and correctly fix hence this is currently marked as
source-only to have a solid base to progress on correct support of this
and hope Upstream QUIC publish newers ath11k drivers for this SoC.
Co-developed-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mantas Pucka <mantas@8devices.com>
[ improve commit description, add SoB for Robert, make it source-only ]
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Now that qualcommax exists as a target and dependencies have been updated
let move ipq807x support to subtarget of qualcommax.
This is mostly copy/paste with the exception of having to update SSDK and
NSS-DP to use CONFIG_TARGET_SUBTARGET.
This is a preparation for later addition of IPQ60xx and IPQ50xx support.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Currently, ipq807x only covers Qualcomm IPQ807x SoC-s.
However, Qualcomm also has IPQ60xx and IPQ50xx SoC-s under the AX WiSoC-s
and they share a lot of stuff with IPQ807x, especially IPQ60xx so to avoid
duplicating kernel patches and everything lets make a common target with
per SoC subtargets.
Start doing that by renaming ipq807x to qualcommax so that dependencies
on ipq807x target can be updated.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
